It's also an examination of Michael Corleone--he starts as his father, but becomes worse than he or anyone in his family ever was. Comparison between PS2 version and PS3 version of The Godfather. Why is The Godfather Part 2 regarded as better than the first part? The Godfather & The Godfather Part II (1972, 1974) Discussion & Skit. He goes back to his roots in Sicily, where he learns even more about his family and comes to respect what his father has accomplished, and eventually returns to America and becomes his father. He says that he is doing everything for him. Young Vito essentially brings a community together and has lines he will not cross. 2 years ago Godfather is the better movie, I think, but Goodfellas is the one I find myself wanting to watch over and over again. Michael Corleone is a man weighed down by the world. That makes a ton of sense for the flashbacks. I get the impression from a lot of people that I've talked to about the movies, that they consider part II to be the best of the three, and I've never been able to understand why. Lot's of glitches, and the graphics were bad enough to be on the original xbox. - Pauline Kael. I enjoy the transformation Michael goes through. Now you come and say "Don Corleone, give me justice." The end of The Godfather fades to black, the word "Intermission" appears on the screen for ten minutes while Nino Rota's score quietly plays, it fades to black again, and The Godfather Part II … But for what it's worth, I prefer the first film as well. Not disagreeing with you, but I think just have a hard time seeing those themes. But i think if he hadn't lost his job at the market I dont think he would have. It really shows just how different Vito and Michael were in youth. The completed work, contrasting the early manhood of Vito (Robert De Niro) with the life of Michael, his inheritor (Al Pacino), is an epic vision of the corruption of America. " (of those 2 I pick Goodfellas). NOW contrast that with Vito, his father, who grew to power by helping other people and connecting with the community around him. They're both great, on multiple levels, but I think Godfather is more engaging and Goodfellas is more entertaining and quotable. And you feared to be in my debt. Pacino became the third actor (after Peter O'Toole) to be twice nominated for an Oscar for portraying the same character; he had previously portrayed Michael Corleone in The Godfather (1972). Vito is fundamentally altruistic, it's even clearly depicted that he only gets into a life of crime as a means of helping his friends, his family, and his community. You found paradise in America. Right from the word go Mario Puzo talks about the inevitability of Vito's rise to power. It's like he's haunted by death. The first time I saw a young Al Pacino on screen in part I all I could think was that he was so cute. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Press J to jump to the feed. I don't see Vito's rise to an organized crime leader as being a 'downfall' though. There'd be no Part II without Part I, but I think Part II is better because it has higher ambitions. His down fall really started when Don Fanucci caused Vito to lose his job to his nephew. THE hardest decision on Flickchart. I do love the first, I like watching that big Italian American family, it reminds me of my big Irish American family. And that last shot, man... it shows how he was probably always like that from the start. Then Vito's fall almost mirrors Michael's. Vito's story, despite the violence and murder, is much more positive because it shows a man rising to become someone great. It's why it's such a complete and complex film. The Godfather is a 1972 American crime film directed by Francis Ford Coppola, who co-wrote the screenplay with Mario Puzo, based on Puzo's best-selling 1969 novel of the same name.The film stars Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, James Caan, Richard Castellano, Robert Duvall, Sterling Hayden, John Marley, Richard Conte, and Diane Keaton.It is the first installment in The Godfather trilogy. The first part shows Michael's rise to fame and becoming his father, essentially. My thoughts below: To refresh your memory the beginning of the Godfather 2 starts when they have successfully moved the family business to Nevada and Michael is in control of a few casinos and hotels. Overall, I would say Part I has fewer flaws, while Part II reaches greater heights, if that makes sense. The fact that these scenes are all cut together masterfully really is what makes the second movie amazing. So you didn't need a friend like me. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. He's gone so far trying to protect his family that he's become cold and ruthless. Im a huge godfather fan and Im currently watching Godfather part 2..Im also watching season 4 of Dallas, and I notice many similarities .Dallas was a Texas version of the Godfather. The second part, however, reaches an epic proportion, showing the extent of the mafia (ie, EVERYWHERE). Cookies help us deliver our Services. It got way to complex for no reason. However, might also the same be said for many other children of successful families who later lose what their parents created. Pacino became the third actor (after Peter O'Toole) to be twice nominated for an Oscar for ... More. This is my first time submitting to r/movies, so I apologize if this is a retread or a discussion on a movie that's already been discussed to death. But he stayed within very specific set of ethics. I think this is why the final scene is so important. I think you really touched on a great point here, which is the contrast in Part II between Vito and Michael. In 1977, a special version for television titled The Godfather: A Novel for Television (1977) was prepared by director Francis Ford Coppola and editor Barry Malkin by re-editing The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather: Part II (1974) in chronological order and adding deleted scenes. “The Godfather Coda,” five minutes shorter than the 1990 version, is about small shifts and intriguing tinkering, plus new bookend sequences. Although an amazing movie, it cannot compare to the Godfather 1. The first film, on it's own, is brilliant. You come into my house on the day my daughter is to be married and you ask me to do murder - for money. What say you? That's how Jimmy Caan got the gig. His family had been killed and he was here alone. But let's be frank here. Godfather 2. While part II does a good job of showing us that descent, I really don't get the same sense of Michael changing as a character, which is one of my favorite things about part I. Maybe that's why he wanted to be isolated from his family? You know tom hagen would have been killed had he decided not to stay? Honestly Part I feels nicer, warmer for want of a better word. For me it had another weird impact. I think in the end it's made clear that if Vitto had been alive during Part II he would be unhappy with the way Michael turned out, especially essentially since he gave up his family and his humanity to maintain his iron grip. The Godfather, Part II is cold and analytical. Kinda ruined most of the suspense in the film. Cookies help us deliver our Services. The Godfather Part II. Fredo and Kay are my favorite characters and they get way more development. I think the second one is lauded for its more complex plot, with the present day story and the flashbacks interleaving nicely. I don't think there's much argument that 2 is the superior film but I've always enjoyed part 1 more. Blake Goble (BG): Listen, I can pick a favorite between The Godfather and The Godfather: Part II .I really can. Because he just doesn't like people? This I feel is why he is so family driven and would do anything for them. 2. There's a sheer thematic gravity to the second film that doesn't exist in the first. Is there something I'm missing? By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The Godfather, Part II is cold and analytical. I could in a weird way see how he was becoming more cruel and serious and how Kay would fall in and out of love with him. Main Theme/The Godfather Waltz from The Godfather Part II by Nino Rota - Original Arrangement. The scene where Vito comes back from his first assassination, and hold Michael in his knee. It shows two generations of an immigrant family's rise and fall, and the moral destruction of Michael Corleone. First of all, the graphics are last generation quality at best as are the physics. Godfather vs Dallas. The Godfather has warm colors, romance, and heart. The Coppola Restoration is a digitally restored edition of The Godfather Trilogy.The restoration was supervised by film preservationist Robert A. Harris.. Can you give some examples of the darker philosophical tones present in the second film? Robert Dinero’s portrayal of a young Vito Corleone was superb. What I always interpreted the last scene as in the Godfather, where he openly lies to Kay after offering her the truth, cements his arc. I doubt Vito would have killed his own brother in a similar circumstance as Michael/Fredo. Then in the second one he has gone so far away from that that he his own brother killed. Gotta go with 2, it's a little less romanticized and the flashbacks to Deniro push it over the top for me. Then, when his family is attacked, he realizes how much he values them and switches his goals to protecting them, going so far as to kill. It's a pretty straight-forward narrative, with a lot of sprawling exploration of how this mafia underworld works. Question I loved the story, the actors and the characters of the first movie and witnessing all those endlessly-referenced movie moments (anything with Marlon Brando, the horse head, killing off the competing families, "don't ask me about my business" etc.) I guess I see part II and III as just spelling out what the end of the first film implies, that he will eventually alienate and destroy the family he's trying to lead. The consuming guilt alluded to in the original opening sequence, after brother Fredo was killed on Michael's orders in "Godfather II," still seeps out in the final chapter. So here we are at the Godfather part 2. He does all these things "to protect his family," but just ends up driving them all away in the end (and in fact, killing his brother who idiotically betrayed him). Which game do you guys like better? In part two we see the disintegration of the family, caused by Michael's actions, and it's beautifully contrasted with Vito's rise in the flashbacks. Satan's Pilgrims - The Godfather (The Godfather Theme - Surf Cover) The Godfather Part II. where flashbacks are used to show the rise of Vito Corleone intercut with the fall of Michael decades later. The pacing of part 2 … It has the flash backs to remind you of the family it Part I and the way they've changed. The Godfather Part II Filming Locations in Sicily The follow up to The Godfather is just as brilliant, some would say more so, than the first film. I don't like one more than the other, I just think both are absolutely amazing movies. 1. As a tale of an immigrant, it was a classic American story. I prefer the first as well. The Godfather: Part II (1974) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. For me, it's because of Pacino's performance in II. I like the idea in Part 2 of showing Michael's downfall paralleled with Vito's rise but nothing in that movie is as gripping as the central narrative of the The original Godfather. Part one sets the tone, part two shows us that Vito knew all along that the life would ruin Michael. It shows two generations of an immigrant family's rise and fall, and the moral destruction of Michael Corleone. Part I is about family, moreso, I think than any other "mob" movie out there. I can't remember the last time you invited me to your house for a cup of coffee, even though my wife is godmother to your only child. Yea I have always seen it as the dichotomy between Father and son. Two things put Godfather 2 on top for me. Vadim Rizov, Team "Godfather II": Some literal new ground's covered: Cuba, Ellis Island, Miami. The plan in 1999 was to revitalize the series with Leonardo DiCaprio as a young Sonny in a two-era narrative à la The Godfather Part II. The game that created it's genre, GTA IV? Man, now I wanna watch the Godfather again. The Mafia Series by far, even if it's not a sandbox game like Godfather, Mafia 1 has a great story although a bit romantic in portraying the mafia circles of that time, Mafia 2 though, has a equally grat story and gameplay but, this time, a darker story but (in my opinion) closer to the truth. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Press J to jump to the feed. So I'm opting to re-edit the movies. The Godfather Part II follows on from the first film in 1958 as well as simultaneously jumping back to 1901 when Don Vito Corleone was a nine-year-old boy called Vito Andolini from Corleone, Sicily and the story continues from there. He starts as someone who wants to have an identity separate from his family, particularly his father. Or is it the "GTA-Clone," The Godfather II? I always have the problem when I try to watch parts 1 and 2 in succession, that I get sort of depressed and disinterested in part 2 … The second film just adds so much more to these characters. Visually, PART II is far more complexly beautiful than the first, just as it's thematically richer, more shadowed, fuller. And Michael becomes much like his father by the end of the first film and even worse into the next. The difference between Part I and Part II is that the first is a more romanticized version of organized crime, in part II we get to see the real side of it which is ruthless, cold and cunning and that it comes with a terrible price. I always have the problem when I try to watch parts 1 and 2 in succession, that I get sort of depressed and disinterested in part 2 almost halfway through it. They are both masterpieces, but I really feel that Part II is essentially perfect with every frame and every word that's spoken. Whynotboth.jpg? Then I watched the Godfather Part II and every time I saw oranges, I knew something was going to happen. I tend to prefer the first film. Simply put, it is the best Mafia game every created and will only be surpassed by its successor - Mafia II. He's constantly exhausted. I understand. I think its also worth mentioning that it could be argued that it was inevitable Vito was going to return to Italy and kill the Don. You could make an easy case for either of them as they are probably the most divided two movies when it comes to which one is better. I re-watch the Godfather series every so often, (even the third on occasion) because it's one of my favorite set of movies, in one of my favorite genres. There'd be no Part II without Part I, but I think Part II is better because it has higher ambitions. Cool Stuff: ‘The Godfather Part II’ Poster By Laurent Durieux Posted on Monday, March 2nd, 2015 by Germain Lussier As a film fan, one of the eternal debates is The Godfather vs. The Godfather II EA Redwood Shores The Godfather II When Michael Corleone comes under investigation by a Senate Committee on Organized Crime, the Corleone Family calls upon you to reestablish its operation in New York. The Godfather: The Coppola Restoration was released on DVD and Blu-ray on September 23, 2008.The Blu-ray box set (four discs) includes high-definition extra features on the restoration and film. But you don't ask with respect. He wasn't wrong then. He was just a business person who provided a service that the community wanted, even though it was mostly illegal. Ehh The Godfather. There's also some ingenious contrast in the second film - where flashbacks are used to show the rise of Vito Corleone intercut with the fall of Michael decades later. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The Godfather has warm colors, romance, and heart. Structurally, they're quite different though, so I can see how that would lead some to have a preference. Micheal loses sight of his family and community and becomes a ruthless bastard. I think Part I is a more tightly constructed movie and has been flow to it, whereas Part II tends to meander at times. What are your thoughts? I see them as two parts of the same whole movie. I like the two films about equally, I'd say. For Michael, his endeavours are selfish. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Part of it may be because Michael is a lot colder and less accessible in part II. I hate to say whether I consider either one, "better," but I think Part II is a better film... though it's contradictory to say so because it wouldn't exist without the first. When it came time to cast a young Don Vito for the sequel, Bob was the obvious choice. And if things had gone the way it was suppose to, Tom Hagen would essentially be acting as Vito's feelings about the road Michael took the family and start a Corleone civil war. One could argue that the flashback sequences are there to illustrate just how incredibly different both Godfathers were. This signifies mediocre business. However in the end, Vito's sins and the empire he creates is what he didn't want Michael to become. But it’s close. Just two halves of one whole. Michael in the first film went from war hero to Don because he was trying to protect his family. But it’s bound to bring up a slow-gestating resentment in the style of Fredo Corleone. Where the first film tells a narrative-oriented story that focuses on the consequences of a business deal gone bad, the second film is much more sprawling and darker in tone and nudges on some huge philosophical touchstones, like the loss of Michael's soul. On the other hand, Part II has a larger scope, delving into the immigrant experience and the changing of America through the early and mid 20th century. We have known each other many years, but this is the first time you've come to me for counsel or for help. But Part II successfully builds on what the first film started, and I think that's a rather rare thing to see done so well. We see the "tip of the iceberg" at the end of the first film, but Michael's ruthlessness isn't fully depicted until the second film. For some reason and I can't tell if it's makeup or what, he's significantly less attractive in part II. You don't even think to call me "Godfather." The book very clearly talks about Vito's destiny. He was handsome but not cute. What stands out about the second one for me is you see how far down Michael has gone but also showing the downfall of Vito. Michael, however, becomes a shell of a man. I don't consider them separate films. The Godfather: Part II Awards and Nominations. THe Godfather games are horrible and there are a lot of reasons why. He was an honest imigrant trying to make a life in America. DeNiro actually auditioned for the role of Sonny in the Godfather. You had a good trade, you made a good living. All views are welcome. I can't remember if Puzo wrote the book after the screenplay, but it seemed clear to me (when I read the book) that Vito would have followed that path regardless. He's so wrapped up in his own world that he destroys the people around them, driving them away because really he just wants to be left alone. I think it's better than Brando's in the first. Game Features (This review is intended for those who are familiar with the films and, as such, contains spoilers.) That's huge. I usually list Part II as my favorite because of three things: Al Pacino's spectacular performance. Mafia 2, Godfather 2 was a huge disapointment compared to the first. I personally think The Godfather Part 1 is a much better movie. For me, Michael's arc is pretty much complete by the end of the first film. Fredo was the only one who supported Michael straying from the family and joining the military, but also by the end of that scene Michael being alone at the table away from all his family. "The daring of PART II is that it enlarges the scope and deepens the meaning of the first film. Throughout the entire first film, we watch the sweeter, milder, gentler side of Michael be consumed, until he is Don Corleone. Both Michael and Vito's downfall was doing what they thought was needed of them for their family. I know Apocalypse Now is the industry standard for Vietnam movies and The Godfather is the industry standard for mob/mafia movies but it should be noted that I like Platoon more than Apocalypse Now and Goodfellas more than The Godfather. Edit- Supposed to be a question. 2:37. Bonasera: I didn't want to get into trouble. It's like asking what side of a dollar bill is worth more. Edit: Okay, it was a tomato garden, but he was playing with an orange peel. Both films have excellent acting and storylines. Instead, we got Sofia Coppola. 3:04. Even though this is at the end of the film the scene forshadows Michaels life. We then see Vito lead to a life of crime to support his family. Allegedly, he was so good that Coppola passed on him because he didn't want Sonny to outshine Pacino's Michael. I re-watch the Godfather series every so often, (even the third on occasion) because it's one of my favorite set of movies, in one of my favorite genres. Granted that it does his children in eventually (Sonny's & Fredo's deaths, Michael being a crime kingpin). I've always been used to old Pacino. You don't offer friendship. You never wanted my friendship. I think it's the complexity of the story-telling that really makes Part II outshine the first. Face-Off: Godfather vs. Godfather Part II February 23, 2012 by: Paul Huffman Last week in the battle between Joseph Gordon-Levitt & Ryan Gosling , it was tough to "choose" the better man. The police protected you and there were courts of law. DeNiro killed it as young Vito and was my favorite part of 2. This. The reason Part II is so perfect especially if watched back to back is because of the way it manipulates your emotions. He was never evil for the sake of being evil.
Best Klorane Shampoo,
Greedfall One Handed Blades Build,
12v Motor Price,
Hair Potion For Hair Growth,
Baylisascaris Procyonis In Rabbits,
Communication In The Past And Present Ppt,